Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery

From: Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery
Date: 2024-03-11 06:59:48
Message-ID: CA+14424sByLRBR=1v+0=Cb_7ZfZPHME+TdJSxufrtvt+BNYaYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:45:01AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > That's nice. You would be able to shave quite a bit of code. If
> > there are no objections, I propose to apply the change of this thread
> > to have this standard explain wrapper at the beginning of next week.
> > If others have any comments, feel free.
>
> Well, done as of a04ddd077e61.
>

Thanks Michael!
--
Best wishes,
Mats Kindahl, Timescale

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-03-11 07:09:39 Re: Failures in constraints regression test, "read only 0 of 8192 bytes"
Previous Message Richard Guo 2024-03-11 06:56:15 Re: Properly pathify the union planner