From: | "Syed, Rahila" <Rahila(dot)Syed(at)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
Date: | 2015-02-24 09:46:22 |
Message-ID: | C3C878A2070C994B9AE61077D46C3846589B0304@MAIL703.KDS.KEANE.COM |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello ,
>I've not read this logic yet, but ISTM there is a bug in that new WAL format because I got the following error and the startup process could not replay any WAL records when I set up replication and enabled wal_compression.
>LOG: record with invalid length at 0/30000B0
>LOG: record with invalid length at 0/3000518
>LOG: Invalid block length in record 0/30005A0
>LOG: Invalid block length in record 0/3000D60 ...
Please fine attached patch which replays WAL records.
Thank you,
Rahila Syed
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Fujii Masao
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:52 PM
To: Rahila Syed
Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Andres Freund; Michael Paquier
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Attached is a patch which has following changes,
>
> As suggested above block ID in xlog structs has been replaced by chunk ID.
> Chunk ID is used to distinguish between different types of xlog record
> fragments.
> Like,
> XLR_CHUNK_ID_DATA_SHORT
> XLR_CHUNK_ID_DATA_LONG
> XLR_CHUNK_BKP_COMPRESSED
> XLR_CHUNK_BKP_WITH_HOLE
>
> In block references, block ID follows the chunk ID. Here block ID
> retains its functionality.
> This approach increases data by 1 byte for each block reference in an
> xlog record. This approach separates ID referring different fragments
> of xlog record from the actual block ID which is used to refer block
> references in xlog record.
I've not read this logic yet, but ISTM there is a bug in that new WAL format because I got the following error and the startup process could not replay any WAL records when I set up replication and enabled wal_compression.
LOG: record with invalid length at 0/30000B0
LOG: record with invalid length at 0/3000518
LOG: Invalid block length in record 0/30005A0
LOG: Invalid block length in record 0/3000D60 ...
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
______________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence
for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient,
please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete
and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying
or forwarding.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
Support-compression-for-full-page-writes-in-WAL_v20.patch | application/octet-stream | 29.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2015-02-24 09:49:28 | Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole? |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2015-02-24 09:44:29 | Re: pg_basebackup may fail to send feedbacks. |