From: | Kartyshov Ivan <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Date: | 2024-03-15 19:59:44 |
Message-ID: | 9e0ad3332c0bf7c4f00ff10677245e46@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-03-11 13:44, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I picked the second option and left only the AFTER clause for the
> BEGIN statement. I think this should be enough for the beginning.
Thank you for your rework on your patch, here I made some fixes:
0) autocomplete
1) less jumps
2) more description and add cases in doc
I think, it will be useful to have stand-alone statement.
Why you would like to see only AFTER clause for the BEGIN statement?
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: www.postgrespro.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v10_after_within.patch | text/x-diff | 23.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-15 20:24:38 | Re: Fix expecteddir argument in pg_regress |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-03-15 19:47:55 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |