From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: speed up unicode normalization quick check |
Date: | 2020-09-18 19:41:54 |
Message-ID: | 9CC07801-6EC2-4166-8B4F-5B336BC99FCD@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 18, 2020, at 9:41 AM, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attached is version 4, which excludes the output file from pgindent,
> to match recent commit 74d4608f5. Since it won't be indented again, I
> also tweaked the generator script to match pgindent for the typedef,
> since we don't want to lose what pgindent has fixed already. This last
> part isn't new to v4, but I thought I'd highlight it anyway.
0001 looks ok to me. The change is quite minor. I reviewed it by comparing the assembly generated for perfect hash functions before and after applying the patch.
For 0001, the assembly code generated from the perfect hash functions in src/common/keywords.s and src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_scanner.s do not appear to differ in any performance significant way. The assembly code generated in src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg_keywords.s and src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/c_keywords.s change enough that I wouldn't try to compare them just by visual inspection.
Compiled using -g -O2
Apple clang version 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.17)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
I'm attaching the diffs of the old and new assembly files, if anyone cares to look.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
assember.diffs | application/octet-stream | 144.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-09-18 20:00:04 | Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-18 19:31:18 | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |