From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench exit code |
Date: | 2018-10-09 10:11:43 |
Message-ID: | 89fc4e59-f374-853e-0bdb-52429c7d340e@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/08/2018 01:41, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Your approach of not changing the output too much but changing the exit
> status and adding a warning may get through more easily.
>
> Note that there is some logic in distinguishing between different type of
> errors (before the bench start vs the bench has started), so I'd suggest
> that the exit status should be different.
done
> The abort is by a client, but the code seems to only check the first
> client of a thread. ISTM that if the second or later client abort it may
> not be detected? Probably an intermediate aggregation at the thread level
> is needed, or maybe a global variable, or as errors are counted somewhere,
> it may be enough just to check that the count is non zero?
fixed
> - [ $status ? qr{^$} : qr{processed: 0/1} ],
> + [],
>
> The patch removes a check that there was an output and that no
> transactions where processed. ISTM it should be kept. If a different exit
> status is chosen on abort, that would allow to keep it easily.
fixed
> Probably there should be some documentation changes as well?
done
New patched attached.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-pgbench-Report-errors-during-run-better.patch | text/plain | 8.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-09 10:20:40 | Re: partition tree inspection functions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-09 10:05:44 | Re: partition tree inspection functions |