From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: committing inside cursor loop |
Date: | 2018-03-29 14:37:05 |
Message-ID: | 87in9fm0df.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> So... what is a pl/* that does _not_ use pinned cursors for cursor
>> loops supposed to do in this case?
Peter> Other than maybe using pinned cursors, one would have to look at
Peter> the whole picture and see what makes sense.
Never mind, I was overlooking the obvious: explicitly specifying
CURSOR_OPT_HOLD is sufficient for me. (Can't really use pinned cursors
because they might not be unpinned fast enough due to timing of garbage
collection, which would lead to spurious errors.)
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-29 14:39:09 | Re: Allow workers to override datallowconn |
Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2018-03-29 14:30:00 | Re: csv format for psql |