Re: System views for versions reporting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: System views for versions reporting
Date: 2025-03-23 22:21:33
Message-ID: 866452.1742768493@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for checking this out. Here is the updated version with applied
> changes. The tests were failing due to injection_points library
> apparently linking something twice, triggering a duplication error I
> didn't expect. Since apparently it can happen, I'm just overwriting
> duplicates.

FWIW, I think the 0004 patch is about to be mostly obsoleted by
Andrei's proposal at [1]. To the extent that it's not obsoleted,
I question whether it's something we want at all, given the ground
rule that unprivileged users are not supposed to have access to info
about the server's filesystem.

regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dd4d1b59-d0fe-49d5-b28f-1e463b68fa32(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuya Watari 2025-03-23 23:23:44 Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-03-23 21:27:58 Add mention in docs about locking all partitions for generic plans