Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date: 2020-07-02 12:25:16
Message-ID: 72631A10-8FEE-4C83-9982-EF59E667C25E@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The automated patchtester for the Commitfest gets confused when there are two
versions of the same changeset attached to the email, as it tries to apply them
both which obviously results in an application failure. I've attached just the
previously submitted patch version to this email to see if we can get a test
run of it.

cheers ./daniel

Attachment Content-Type Size
copy-progress-v2.patch application/octet-stream 20.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 12:39:14 Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 12:12:51 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority