From: | "Matthijs van der Vleuten" <postgresql(at)zr40(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [PATCH] In psql \?, add [+] annotation where appropriate |
Date: | 2021-03-21 19:41:47 |
Message-ID: | 6a984e24-2171-4039-9050-92d55e7b23fe@www.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
User inoas on IRC channel #postgresql noted that \? does not describe \do as supporting the + option. It does however support this option, as do \dAp and \dy.
This patch adds the annotation to the description of these commands in \?.
While adding it to the translation files I noticed some obvious errors, so this patch fixes the following as well:
* correct inconsistent alignment. This was especially egregious in fr.po. Differing alignment across sections in es.po is preserved as this may have been a deliberate choice by the translator.
* cs.po: remove extraneous newline
* es.po: replace incorrect mention of \do with the correct \dAc, \dAf and \dAo
* fr.po: merge some small lines that still fit within 78 chars
* fr.po: remove [brackets] denoting optional parameters, when these aren't present in the English text
* fr.po: \sv was shown as accepting "FONCTION". This is replaced with "VUE".
* fr.po: \t was missing its optional [on|off] parameter.
* tr.po: fix typo at \d
* uk.po: add missing newline at \c
Regards,
Matthijs
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-In-psql-add-annotation.patch | text/x-patch | 63.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-21 19:56:14 | Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2021-03-21 19:36:51 | Re: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba |