| From: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? |
| Date: | 2025-03-27 07:20:30 |
| Message-ID: | 6059.1743060030@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2025-Mar-22, Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > > I rebased this patch series; here's v09. No substantive changes from v08.
> > > I made sure the tree still compiles after each commit.
>
> I rebased again, fixing a compiler warning reported by CI and applying
> pgindent to each individual patch. I'm slowly starting to become more
> familiar with the whole of this new code.
I'm trying to reflect Robert's suggestions about locking [1]. The next version
should be a bit simpler, so maybe wait for it before you continue studying the
code.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | cca5507 | 2025-03-27 07:26:51 | Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2025-03-27 07:10:35 | Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding |