From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Date: | 2016-10-05 08:59:04 |
Message-ID: | 5dded2f1-c7f6-e7fc-56b5-23ab59495e4b@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2016/10/05 16:57, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi wrote:
> I observed, when creating foreign table with range partition, data is not
> inserting into specified partition range. below are steps to reproduce.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> postgres=# INSERT INTO test_range (a) values (5),(25),(15);
> INSERT 0 3
>
> postgres=# select tableoid::regclass, * from test_range;
> tableoid | a
> ------------------+----
> ft_test_range_p1 | 5
> ft_test_range_p2 | 15
> ft_test_range_p3 | 25
> (3 rows)
>
> --Here ft_test_range_p2 is created for range 20-30 having value 15.
Thanks a lot for testing.
That's a bug. I found that it is caused by the FDW plans getting paired
with the wrong result relations during ExecInitModifyTable() initialization.
I will include a fix for the same in the patch set that I will be sending
soon in reply to Robert's review comments on patch 0002 [1].
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-10-05 09:03:42 | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-10-05 08:15:46 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription |