From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32 |
Date: | 2020-11-25 16:23:20 |
Message-ID: | 5cba03cd-cff3-9f81-ba4f-4fd91e08bbce@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-11-02 16:59, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have committed 0003.
>
> For 0001, normal_rand(), I think you should reject negative arguments
> with an error.
I have committed a fix for that.
> For 0002, I think you should change the block number arguments to int8,
> same as other contrib modules do.
Looking further into this, almost all of pageinspect needs to be updated
to handle block numbers larger than INT_MAX correctly. Attached is a
patch for this. It is meant to work like other contrib modules, such as
pg_freespace and pg_visibility. I haven't tested this much yet.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-pageinspect-Change-block-number-arguments-to-bigint.patch | text/plain | 13.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-25 16:43:27 | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-11-25 16:21:35 | Re: Transaction isolation and table contraints |