From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw |
Date: | 2018-12-26 07:35:21 |
Message-ID: | 5C232F39.9060509@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/12/17 22:09), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Here is a set of WIP patches for pushing down ORDER BY LIMIT to the remote:
> For some regression test cases with ORDER BY and/or LIMIT, I noticed
> that these patches still cannot push down those clause to the remote. I
> guess it would be needed to tweak the cost/size estimation added by
> these patches, but I didn't look at that in detail yet. Maybe I'm
> missing something, though.
I looked into that. In the previous patch, I estimated costs for
performing grouping/aggregation with ORDER BY remotely, using the same
heuristic as scan/join cases if appropriate (i.e., I assumed that a
remote sort for grouping/aggregation also costs 20% extra), but that
seems too large for grouping/aggregation. So I reduced that to 5%
extra. The result showed that some test cases can be pushed down, but
some still cannot. I think we could push down the ORDER BY in all cases
by reducing the extra cost to a much smaller value, but I'm not sure
what value is reasonable.
Attached is an updated version of the patch. Other changes:
* Modified estimate_path_cost_size() further so that it accounts for
tlist eval cost as well
* Added more comments
* Simplified code a little bit
I'll add this to the upcoming CF.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-postgres_fdw-Perform-UPPERREL_ORDERED-step-remotely.patch | text/x-patch | 46.2 KB |
0002-postgres_fdw-Perform-UPPERREL_FINAL-step-remotely.patch | text/x-patch | 95.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-12-26 07:40:00 | RE: Timeout parameters |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-12-26 06:24:01 | Re: Don't wake up to check trigger file if none is configured |