From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Date: | 2018-01-31 02:17:01 |
Message-ID: | 5A71271D.3040900@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/01/31 4:56), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It looks like Etsuro-san's proposed patch locks down the choice of
>> plan more tightly, which is probably a reasonable answer.
>
> OK, committed. I added a comment along the lines you suggested
> previously, since this no longer seems like a generic test that
> happens to involve a bunch of merge joins.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-31 02:48:09 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-01-31 02:05:33 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |