From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | typmod is always -1 |
Date: | 2016-03-17 04:39:35 |
Message-ID: | 56EA3507.6090701@anastigmatix.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
nothing like resurrecting a really old thread ...
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I have a problem - every call of mvarcharin is with typmod = -1.
2009/3/17 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Also, there are a bunch of scenarios where we rely on a cast function to
> apply the typmod rather than passing it to the input function initially.
> I'm not sure if the particular case you're checking here falls into that
> category,
Is it possible to name any case that *does not* fall into that category?
I'm in the same boat ... I have an input function I want to test, and so
far I have failed to think of *any* sql construct that causes it to be
invoked with other than -1 for the typmod.
> but you definitely should have a "length conversion cast"
> function in pg_cast if you expect to do anything useful with typmod.
Ok, that's good to know (and I didn't until now). But back to the
input and recv functions, which are both documented to have 3-arg
forms that get typmods ... how would one test them? Is there any
sql syntax that can be written to make them get passed a typmod?
If I just write them with assert(typmod == -1), will anyone ever
see a failure?
-Chap
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-03-17 04:43:53 | Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types |
Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-03-17 04:13:05 | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |