| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps |
| Date: | 2023-01-01 19:22:58 |
| Message-ID: | 551c7fed-e188-1c00-bf98-7902dc4d4b58@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/1/23 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
>> Hmm. Somehow the .out test files were not included.
>> Fixed with attached.
>
> Somehow you'd managed to duplicate some of the other changes,
> so the cfbot still didn't like that :-(
>
> Anyway, pushed with cosmetic changes. Notably, I left out the
> documentation changes after observing that we don't document
> "+infinity" separately for the numeric types. Given the lack of
> complaints about that I think it's fine to do the same here.
Thanks, Tom! No objections to your changes.
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-01-01 19:38:25 | Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-01 19:21:04 | Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps |