Re: inherit support for foreign tables

(2014/07/01 11:10), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2014/06/30 22:48), Tom Lane wrote:
>> Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>> Done. I think this is because create_foreignscan_plan() makes reference
>>> to attr_needed, which isn't computed for inheritance children.
>>
>> I wonder whether it isn't time to change that. It was coded like that
>> originally only because calculating the values would've been a waste of
>> cycles at the time. But this is at least the third place where it'd be
>> useful to have attr_needed for child rels.
>
> +1 for calculating attr_needed for child rels. (I was wondering too.)
>
> I'll create a separate patch for it.

Attached is a WIP patch for that. The following functions have been
changed to refer to attr_needed:

* check_index_only()
* remove_unused_subquery_outputs()
* check_selective_binary_conversion()

I'll add this to the upcoming commitfest. If anyone has any time to
glance at it before then, that would be a great help.

Thanks,

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita