From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Davin Shearer <davin(at)apache(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
Date: | 2023-12-02 14:31:46 |
Message-ID: | 411395e0-697e-44ab-be98-dd2047f9a10e@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 12/1/23 18:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:28:55PM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
>> I did a quick PoC patch (attached) -- if there interest and no hard
>> objections I would like to get it up to speed for the January commitfest.
>
> Cool. I would expect there to be interest, given all the other JSON
> support that has been added thus far.
Thanks for the review
> I noticed that, with the PoC patch, "json" is the only format that must be
> quoted. Without quotes, I see a syntax error. I'm assuming there's a
> conflict with another json-related rule somewhere in gram.y, but I haven't
> tracked down exactly which one is causing it.
It seems to be because 'json' is also a type name ($$ =
SystemTypeName("json")).
What do you think about using 'json_array' instead? It is more specific
and accurate, and avoids the need to quote.
test=# copy foo to stdout (format json_array);
[
{"id":1,"f1":"line: 1","f2":"2023-12-01T12:58:16.776863-05:00"}
,{"id":2,"f1":"line: 2","f2":"2023-12-01T12:58:16.777084-05:00"}
,{"id":3,"f1":"line: 3","f2":"2023-12-01T12:58:16.777096-05:00"}
,{"id":4,"f1":"line: 4","f2":"2023-12-01T12:58:16.777103-05:00"}
]
>> 1. Is supporting JSON array format sufficient, or does it need to support
>> some other options? How flexible does the support scheme need to be?
>
> I don't presently have a strong opinion on this one. My instinct would be
> start with something simple, though. I don't think we offer any special
> options for log_destination...
WFM
>> 2. This only supports COPY TO and we would undoubtedly want to support COPY
>> FROM for JSON as well, but is that required from the start?
>
> I would vote for including COPY FROM support from the start.
Check. My thought is to only accept the same format we emit -- i.e. only
take a json array.
>> ! if (!cstate->opts.json_mode)
>
> I think it's unfortunate that this further complicates the branching in
> CopyOneRowTo(), but after some quick glances at the code, I'm not sure it's
> worth refactoring a bunch of stuff to make this nicer.
Yeah that was my conclusion.
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-12-02 15:11:20 | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2023-12-02 03:10:54 | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-12-02 15:11:20 | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2023-12-02 14:06:29 | Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? |