From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Subject: | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables |
Date: | 2018-03-19 08:50:10 |
Message-ID: | 32e466b1-653f-6fa3-2f3f-68ac8fb3131e@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/03/19 16:45, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have tried to make these changes and attached are the updated patches
> containing those, including the change I suggested for 0001 (that is,
> getting rid of mt_onconflict). I also expanded some comments in 0003
> while making those changes.
I realized that there should be a test where transition table is involved
for an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE on a partitioned table due to relevant
statement trigger on the table; something like the attached. But due to a
bug being discussed over at [1], we won't get the correct expected output
for the test until the latest patch submitted for that bug [2] is
committed as a bug fix.
Thanks,
Amit
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ba19eff9-2120-680e-4671-55a9bea9454f%40lab.ntt.co.jp
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/df921671-32df-45ea-c0e4-9b51ee86ba3b%40lab.ntt.co.jp
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-More-tests-for-ON-CONFLICT-DO-UPDATE-on-partitioned-.patch | text/plain | 4.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2018-03-19 09:28:51 | Typo in be_tls_write |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2018-03-19 08:48:44 | Re: MCV lists for highly skewed distributions |