Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> +1 for that terminology and no renaming of fields.
> Agreed.
Here's an updated version of the RLS planning patch that gets rid of
the incorrect interaction with Query.hasRowSecurity and adjusts
terminology as agreed.
regards, tom lane