From: | "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add pg_ownerships and pg_privileges system views |
Date: | 2024-10-20 14:52:15 |
Message-ID: | 306c3ab4-f9d2-4e66-87d0-03d155325f1b@app.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024, at 12:14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think the function calls should be in the FROM clause, and restrict the
> pg_shdepend rows to only the ones in the current database:
Cool. I assume pg_ownerships should be changed in the same way?
New patch attached.
> Now, depending on pg_shdepend for this means that you don't report
> anything for an object until a GRANT to another user has been executed.
> For example if you REVOKE some priv from the object owner, nothing is
> shown until a GRANT is done for another user (and at that point onwards,
> privs by the owner are shown). This seems less than ideal, but I'm not
> sure how to do different, other than ditching the use of pg_shdepend
> entirely.
Hmm, yeah that's a bit awkward. Maybe okay if clearly documented.
/Joel
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Add-pg_ownerships-and-pg_privileges-system-views.patch | application/octet-stream | 16.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-10-20 15:56:55 | Re: Fix C23 compiler warning |
Previous Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-10-20 14:18:33 | Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum |