From: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Date: | 2023-02-20 16:47:58 |
Message-ID: | 2EA8FDC7-55B2-4213-ACCD-5B7CD3C9B486@amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks!
> I think PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_TOTAL and
> PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_PROCESSED are better for consistency. The rest
> looks good to me.
Took care of that in v25.
Regards
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v25-0001-Add-2-new-columns-to-pg_stat_progress_vacuum.-Th.patch | application/octet-stream | 14.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-02-20 16:53:43 | Re: Killing off removed rels properly |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-02-20 16:33:28 | Re: Killing off removed rels properly |