Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date: 2023-02-20 16:47:58
Message-ID: 2EA8FDC7-55B2-4213-ACCD-5B7CD3C9B486@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks!

> I think PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_TOTAL and
> PROGRESS_VACUUM_INDEXES_PROCESSED are better for consistency. The rest
> looks good to me.

Took care of that in v25.

Regards

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v25-0001-Add-2-new-columns-to-pg_stat_progress_vacuum.-Th.patch application/octet-stream 14.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-20 16:53:43 Re: Killing off removed rels properly
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-20 16:33:28 Re: Killing off removed rels properly