| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Umar Hayat <postgresql(dot)wizard(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladyslav Nebozhyn <vlad(at)liberatii(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Request: Add AES-128-CFB Mode Support to pgcrypto |
| Date: | 2025-02-14 20:53:25 |
| Message-ID: | 2CB9F697-4DD9-45C1-AD0A-10A7354FA68B@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:28, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:24, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, at least the bytes appear to be interpreted the same by both
>> openssl and this new function, so that's good news.
>
> Thanks for confirming. Short of a very small doc change (which I don't have
> handy on this laptop) I think this patch is ready. I wish we had a better way
> of adding support for ciphers in OpenSSL but it's not the responsibility of
> this patch to solve that.
I took another look at this, fixed the trivial detail in the docs, and applied
it. Thanks for the submission!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-02-14 20:54:33 | Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-14 20:51:51 | Re: Parameter binding for COPY TO queries |