Re: Feature Request: Add AES-128-CFB Mode Support to pgcrypto

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Umar Hayat <postgresql(dot)wizard(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vladyslav Nebozhyn <vlad(at)liberatii(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature Request: Add AES-128-CFB Mode Support to pgcrypto
Date: 2025-02-14 20:53:25
Message-ID: 2CB9F697-4DD9-45C1-AD0A-10A7354FA68B@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:28, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:24, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, at least the bytes appear to be interpreted the same by both
>> openssl and this new function, so that's good news.
>
> Thanks for confirming. Short of a very small doc change (which I don't have
> handy on this laptop) I think this patch is ready. I wish we had a better way
> of adding support for ciphers in OpenSSL but it's not the responsibility of
> this patch to solve that.

I took another look at this, fixed the trivial detail in the docs, and applied
it. Thanks for the submission!

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-02-14 20:54:33 Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-02-14 20:51:51 Re: Parameter binding for COPY TO queries