From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tony Locke <tlocke(at)tlocke(dot)org(dot)uk>, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Haumacher, Bernhard" <haui(at)haumacher(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error on failed COMMIT |
Date: | 2021-03-25 19:23:53 |
Message-ID: | 29c7a9e8-c634-3e51-873b-0a275d54cab5@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/25/21 3:07 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 12:04, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> Test are failing on the cfbot for this patch and it looks like a new
> patch is needed from Dave, at the least, so marking Waiting on Author.
>
> Should we be considering this patch Returned with Feedback instead?
>
> Not sure, at this point the impetus for this is not getting a lot of
> traction.
> Honestly I think the approach I took is too simple and I don't have the
> inclination at the moment to
> rewrite it.
In that case Returned with Feedback is appropriate so I have done that.
Of course, the conversation can continue on this thread or a new one and
when you have a new patch you can create a new CF entry.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-03-25 19:47:26 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2021-03-25 19:07:17 | Re: Error on failed COMMIT |