From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | clean up pid_t printing and get rid of pgpid_t |
Date: | 2022-10-10 08:57:21 |
Message-ID: | 289c2e45-c7d9-5ce4-7eff-a9e2a33e1580@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.10.22 10:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I wanted to propose the attached patch to get rid of the custom pgpid_t
> typedef in pg_ctl. Since we liberally use pid_t elsewhere, this seemed
> plausible.
>
> However, this patch fails the CompilerWarnings job on Cirrus, because
> apparently under mingw, pid_t is "volatile long long int", so all the
> printf placeholders mismatch. However, we print pid_t as %d in a lot of
> other places, so I'm confused why this fails here.
I figured out that in most places we actually store PIDs in int, and in
the cases where we use pid_t, casts before printing are indeed used and
necessary. So nevermind that.
In any case, I took this opportunity to standardize the printing of PIDs
as %d. There were a few stragglers.
And then the original patch to get rid of pgpid_t in pg_ctl, now updated
with the correct casts for printing. I confirmed that this now passes
the CompilerWarnings job.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-doc-Correct-type-of-bgw_notify_pid.patch | text/plain | 939 bytes |
v2-0002-Standardize-format-for-printing-PIDs.patch | text/plain | 4.3 KB |
v2-0003-Remove-pgpid_t-type-use-pid_t-instead.patch | text/plain | 11.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-10-10 09:16:12 | Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15) |
Previous Message | Japin Li | 2022-10-10 08:50:17 | Re: Remove unnecessary commas for goto labels |