| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |
| Date: | 2020-03-04 15:15:47 |
| Message-ID: | 2207744f6cc70813d9000510b6bf03ce85db6675.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 16:28 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> As a more substantial base for discussion, here is a patch that:
>
> - introduces a GUC and reloption "autovacuum_vacuum_insert_limit",
> default 10000000
>
> - introduces a statistics counter "inserts_since_vacuum" per table
> that gets reset to 0 after vacuum
>
> - causes autovacuum to run without cleaning up indexes if
> inserts_since_vacuum > autovacuum_vacuum_insert_limit
> and there is no other reason for an autovacuum
I just realized that the exercise is pointless unless that
autovacuum also runs with FREEZE on.
Updated patch attached.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Autovacuum-tables-that-have-received-only-inserts.v2.patch | text/x-patch | 12.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-04 15:35:16 | Re: Symbolic names for the values of typalign and typstorage |
| Previous Message | Georgios Kokolatos | 2020-03-04 15:02:58 | Re: ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY tab completion |