From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Two small bugs in guc.c |
Date: | 2023-12-26 19:02:33 |
Message-ID: | 2089235.1703617353@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I investigated the report at [1] about pg_file_settings not reporting
invalid values of "log_connections". It turns out it's broken for
PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND parameters, but not other ones.
The cause is a bit of premature optimization in this logic:
* If a PGC_BACKEND or PGC_SU_BACKEND parameter is changed in
* the config file, we want to accept the new value in the
* postmaster (whence it will propagate to
* subsequently-started backends), but ignore it in existing
* backends. ...
Upon detecting that case, set_config_option just returns -1 immediately
without bothering to validate the value. It should check for invalid
input before returning -1, which we can mechanize with a one-line fix:
- return -1;
+ changeVal = false;
While studying this, I also noted that the bit to prevent changes in
parallel workers seems seriously broken:
if (IsInParallelMode() && changeVal && action != GUC_ACTION_SAVE)
ereport(elevel,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TRANSACTION_STATE),
errmsg("cannot set parameters during a parallel operation")));
This is evidently assuming that ereport() won't return, which seems
like a very dubious assumption given the various values that elevel
can have. Maybe it's accidentally true -- I don't recall any
reports of trouble here -- but it sure looks fragile.
Hence, proposed patch attached.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-fix-set_config_option-logic-bugs.patch | text/x-diff | 1.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-12-26 19:19:04 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-12-26 18:55:20 | Re: Moving forward with TDE |