| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
| Date: | 2025-03-28 18:12:58 |
| Message-ID: | 202503281812.33bmlx2yuy7w@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Mar-28, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think instead of going this direction, we really need to create a
> separately-purposed script that simply creates "one of everything"
> without doing anything else (except maybe loading a little data).
> I believe it'd be a lot easier to remember to add to that when
> inventing new SQL than to remember to leave something behind from the
> core regression tests. This would also be far faster to run than any
> approach that involves picking a random subset of the core test
> scripts.
FWIW this sounds closely related to what I tried to do with
src/test/modules/test_ddl_deparse; it's currently incomplete, but maybe
we can use that as a starting point.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Always assume the user will do much worse than the stupidest thing
you can imagine." (Julien PUYDT)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-03-28 18:20:57 | Re: Latches vs lwlock contention |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-03-28 17:47:16 | Re: pg_stat_database.checksum_failures vs shared relations |