Re: not null constraints, again

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not null constraints, again
Date: 2024-09-24 19:07:14
Message-ID: 202409241907.gkydyq25j5gm@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Sep-24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I have made these changes and added some tests, and will be posting a v5
> shortly.

I ran the coverage report and found a couple of ereports are not covered
by any tests. I'm adding those. May add more tomorrow, after looking
at the coverage report some more.

I should give a try at running Andres' differential coverage report[1]
at some point ...

[1] https://postgr.es/m/20240414223305.m3i5eju6zylabvln%40awork3.anarazel.de

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Catalog-not-null-constraints.patch text/x-diff 294.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-24 19:26:08 Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2024-09-24 18:31:10 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support