Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date: 2024-01-23 02:46:52
Message-ID: 20240123024652.GA2251765@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 05:00:48PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:43 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Oops. I've attached an attempt at fixing this. I took the opportunity to
>> clean up the surrounding code a bit.
>
> The code looks cleaner and readable with the patch. All the call sites
> are taking care of dsm_attach returning NULL value. So, the attached
> patch looks good to me.

Committed. Thanks for the report and the reviews.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-01-23 02:56:25 Re: Support "Right Semi Join" plan shapes
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-01-23 02:30:29 Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column