| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wrong usage of pqMsg_Close message code? |
| Date: | 2023-08-29 21:11:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20230829211106.GA2266537@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:15:55AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for the report. I'll get this fixed up. My guess is that this was
> leftover from an earlier version of the patch that used the same macro for
> identical protocol characters.
I plan to commit the attached patch shortly.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Fix-misuse-of-PqMsg_Close.patch | text/x-diff | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-08-29 21:38:27 | Re: Is pg_regress --use-existing used by anyone or is it broken? |
| Previous Message | Stuart McGraw | 2023-08-29 20:44:48 | Re: Restoring default privileges on objects |