| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: allow granting CLUSTER, REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW, and REINDEX |
| Date: | 2023-06-21 17:16:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20230621171624.GA881253@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 09:15:18PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Perhaps we should add something like
>
> Note that while REINDEX on a partitioned index or table requires
> MAINTAIN on the partitioned table, such commands skip the privilege
> checks when processing the individual partitions.
>
> Thoughts? I'm trying to keep the privilege documentation for maintenance
> commands as simple as possible, so I'm hoping to avoid adding too much text
> dedicated to these special cases.
Here is a new patch set that includes this new sentence.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v8-0001-partial-revert-of-ff9618e82a.patch | text/x-diff | 21.6 KB |
| v8-0002-simplify-privilege-related-documentation-for-main.patch | text/x-diff | 8.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-06-21 17:17:33 | Re: collation-related loose ends before beta2 |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2023-06-21 17:13:44 | Re: RFC: logical publication via inheritance root? |