From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command |
Date: | 2023-02-25 19:39:29 |
Message-ID: | 20230225193929.GA919073@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:28:25AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:07:42AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I think the much more interesting assertion here would be to check that
>> MyProc->pid equals the current pid.
>
> I don't mind changing this, but why is this a more interesting assertion?
Here is a new patch set with this change.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-Move-extra-code-out-of-the-Pre-PostRestoreCommand.patch | text/x-diff | 2.0 KB |
v8-0002-Don-t-proc_exit-in-startup-s-SIGTERM-handler-if-f.patch | text/x-diff | 2.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-25 19:52:53 | Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-02-25 19:28:25 | Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command |