Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date: 2023-02-22 17:08:28
Message-ID: 20230222170828.GB10734@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:30:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay, applied and backpatched with a minimal test set, then. I have
> kept the tweaks I did to the tests with extra comments.

Thanks!

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirk Wolak 2023-02-22 17:17:46 Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-22 17:07:37 Re: Fix the description of GUC "max_locks_per_transaction" and "max_pred_locks_per_transaction" in guc_table.c