| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, joel(at)compiler(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |
| Date: | 2022-09-06 10:23:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20220906102312.4npuynhyvd2dy6qj@jrouhaud |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:43:59AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> After talking with Julian I removed "debug" fields name and nsname from
> SVariable structure. When it is possible it is better to read these fields
> from catalog without risk of obsoletely or necessity to refresh these
> fields. In other cases we display only oid of variable instead name and
> nsname (It is used just for debug purposes).
Thanks! I'm just adding back the forgotten Cc list.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v20220906-1-0001-catalog-support-for-session-variables.patch | text/plain | 98.2 KB |
| v20220906-1-0002-session-variables.patch | text/plain | 94.1 KB |
| v20220906-1-0003-LET-command.patch | text/plain | 38.5 KB |
| v20220906-1-0004-support-of-LET-command-in-PLpgSQL.patch | text/plain | 11.5 KB |
| v20220906-1-0005-DISCARD-VARIABLES-command.patch | text/plain | 3.2 KB |
| v20220906-1-0006-enhancing-psql-for-session-variables.patch | text/plain | 15.1 KB |
| v20220906-1-0007-possibility-to-dump-session-variables-by-pg_dump.patch | text/plain | 19.5 KB |
| v20220906-1-0008-typedefs.patch | text/plain | 1.6 KB |
| v20220906-1-0009-regress-tests-for-session-variables.patch | text/plain | 51.8 KB |
| v20220906-1-0010-this-patch-changes-error-message-column-doesn-t-exis.patch | text/plain | 23.7 KB |
| v20220906-1-0011-documentation.patch | text/plain | 42.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-09-06 10:25:25 | Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-09-06 10:18:52 | Re: [PATCH] Clarify the comments about varlena header encoding |