From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
Date: | 2022-03-24 23:50:44 |
Message-ID: | 20220325.085044.1558067588516003704.t-ishii@sranhm.sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> My machine (Ubuntu 20) did not complain either. Maybe perl version
>> difference? Any way, the fix pushed. Let's see how prairiedog feels.
>
> Still not happy. After some digging in man pages, I believe the
> problem is that its old version of Perl does not understand "\gN"
> backreferences. Is there a good reason to be using that rather
> than the traditional "\N" backref notation?
I don't see a reason to use "\gN" either. Actually after applying
attached patch, my machine is still happy with pgbench test.
Yugo?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix_pgbench_test_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 583 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-25 00:02:34 | Re: Race conditions in 019_replslot_limit.pl |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2022-03-24 23:42:37 | Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |