| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DELETE CASCADE |
| Date: | 2022-01-31 16:30:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20220131163034.5olg3vhh6wc46gs7@jrouhaud |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 09:14:21AM -0600, David Christensen wrote:
>
> Sounds good; when I get time to look at this again I will resubmit (if
> people think the base functionality is worth it, which is still a topic of
> discussion).
Yes, please do! Sorry I should have mentioned it, if a patch is closed as
Return with Feedback it means that the feature is wanted, which was my
understanding backlogging this thread, so submitting in some later commit fest
is expected.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2022-01-31 16:51:11 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2022-01-31 16:28:31 | Re: Multiple Query IDs for a rewritten parse tree |