From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: doc review for v14 |
Date: | 2021-03-01 00:46:47 |
Message-ID: | 20210301004647.GF20769@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:18:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This leaves 0003, 0004, 0005, 0010, 0012, 0018, 0020 and 0021 as these
> did not look like improvements after review.
It looks like you applied 0010...but I agree that it's not an improvement. It
appears that's something I intended to go back and revisit myself.
The rest of the patch looks right, to me.
Subject: [PATCH 10/21] doc review for checksum docs
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml | 18 +++++++++---------
I'm suggesting to either revert that part, or apply these more polished changes
in 0002.
--
Justin
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Partially-revert-bcf2667bf62d72faced64cb60ffbd2e599a.patch | text/x-diff | 2.3 KB |
0002-Second-attempt-to-improve-checksum-docs.patch | text/x-diff | 2.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-01 00:53:49 | Regex back-reference semantics and performance |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-02-28 23:08:17 | Re: Different compression methods for FPI |