Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index
Date: 2021-02-26 18:20:19
Message-ID: 20210226182019.GU20769@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:07:05PM +0300, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> 5) Speaking of documentation, I think we need to add a paragraph about CIC
> on partitioned indexes which will explain that invalid indexes may appear
> and what user should do to fix them.

I'm not sure about that - it's already documented in general, for
nonpartitioned indexes.

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Allow-CREATE-INDEX-CONCURRENTLY-on-partitioned-table.patch text/x-diff 13.6 KB
0002-f-progress-reporting.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB
0003-WIP-Add-SKIPVALID-flag-for-more-integration.patch text/x-diff 3.1 KB
0004-ReindexPartitions-to-set-indisvalid.patch text/x-diff 2.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-02-26 18:55:10 Re: Some regular-expression performance hacking
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-02-26 18:11:46 Re: Interest in GSoC 2021 Projects