Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data
Date: 2020-11-21 10:50:05
Message-ID: 20201121105005.GB15192@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:04:57PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks! Attaching the patch. Please review it.

Thanks. I have removed the references to the INSERT check in the
comments and the docs, because that would be confusing as it refers
to something we don't do anymore now with this patch, reordered the
tests and applied the patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-21 13:32:53 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Krasiyan Andreev 2020-11-21 09:07:09 Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions