From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration |
Date: | 2020-09-20 03:41:13 |
Message-ID: | 20200920034113.GA1858@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:22:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay, after looking at that, here is v3. This includes range checks
> as well as errno checks based on strtol(). What do you think?
This fails in the CF bot on Linux because of pg_logging_init()
returning with errno=ENOTTY in the TAP tests, for which I began a new
thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200918095713.GA20887@paquier.xyz
Not sure if this will lead anywhere, but we can also address the
failure by enforcing errno=0 for the new calls of strtol() introduced
in this patch. So here is an updated patch doing so.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgtest-fix-range-v4.patch | text/x-diff | 6.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-09-20 05:31:39 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-09-20 02:24:26 | Re: Collation versioning |