From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bruce(at)momjian(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "cert" + clientcert=verify-ca in pg_hba.conf? |
Date: | 2020-09-01 04:59:25 |
Message-ID: | 20200901.135925.978348091043259338.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:34:29 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote in
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:56:58PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Ok, this is that. If we spcify clientcert=no-verify other than for
> > "cert" authentication, server complains as the following at startup.
>
> Why does clientcert=no-verify have any value, even for a
> cert-authentication line?
>
> > > LOG: no-verify or 0 is the default setting that is discouraged to use explicitly for clientcert option
> > > HINT: Consider removing the option instead. This option value is going to be deprecated in later version.
> > > CONTEXT: line 90 of configuration file "/home/horiguti/data/data_noverify/pg_hba.conf"
>
> I think it should just be removed in PG 14. This is a configuration
> setting, not an SQL-level item that needs a deprecation period.
Ok, it is changed to just error out. I tempted to show a suggestion to
removing the option in that case like the following, but *didn't* in
this version of the patch.
> LOG: invalid value for clientcert: "no-verify"
?? HINT: Instead, consider removing the clinetcert option.
> CONTEXT: line 90 of configuration file "/h
> > I'm going to register this to the coming CF.
>
> I plan to apply this once we are done discussing it.
Roger.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Deprecate-no-verify-for-clientcert.patch | text/x-patch | 4.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-01 05:27:15 | Re: Use T_IntList for uint32 |
Previous Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2020-09-01 04:47:46 | Re: Ideas about a better API for postgres_fdw remote estimates |