Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Date: 2020-04-07 00:12:43
Message-ID: 20200407.091243.1526068106063312556.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:54:56 -0400, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote in
> Thanks for the revised version. Please note that you forgot to "git
> add" the test file, to it's not in the patch.

Oops! I forgot that I was working after just doing patch -p1 on my
working directory. This is the version that contains the test script.

> I'm reviewing the patch now.

Thanks!

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
v25-0001-Add-WAL-relief-vent-for-replication-slots.patch text/x-patch 30.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-04-07 00:14:32 Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-04-06 23:52:28 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()