| From: | "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays |
| Date: | 2019-10-02 07:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | 201DD0641B056142AC8C6645EC1B5F62014B91C5B2@SYD1217 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2019 9:42 AM
> I don't have any strong opinion on this, but I would mildly prefer to initialize boolean array with false just for the sake of readability (we generally initializing booleans with false).
Done. Please see attached updated patch.
Kind Regards
--
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| c99_init_nulls_2.patch | application/octet-stream | 81.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2019-10-02 08:38:36 | Re: Recovery performance of DROP DATABASE with many tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-10-02 07:30:38 | Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting? |