Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
Date: 2019-11-20 07:44:18
Message-ID: 20191120074418.GA47145@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:34:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> It seems to me that if the plan is to have one option structure for
> each index AM, which has actually the advantage to reduce the bloat of
> each relcache entry currently relying on StdRdOptions, then we could
> have those extra assertion checks in the same patch, because the new
> macros are introduced.

I have looked at this patch, and did not like much having the
calculations of the page free space around, so I have moved that into
each AM's dedicated header.

> There is rd_rel->relam. You can for example refer to pgstatindex.c
> which has AM-related checks to make sure that the correct index AM is
> being used.

We can do something similar for GIN and BRIN on top of the rest, so
updated the patch with that. Nikolay, I would be fine to commit this
patch as-is. Thanks for your patience on this stuff.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
do-not-use-StdRdOptions-in-AM_4.diff text/x-diff 13.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-11-20 07:55:39 Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-11-20 07:40:06 Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files