Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal
Date: 2018-12-10 06:10:36
Message-ID: 20181210061036.GC1105@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:18:12PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> That seems reasonable to me.

Thanks, committed after renaming a couple of variables, after adding a
comment about the use of unlink() and also adding a comment explaining
what the different retry counters are here for.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-10 06:33:07 Re: [PATCH] Log PostgreSQL version number on startup
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-12-10 02:58:41 Re: min_parallel_table_size and inheritence