From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
Cc: | tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries |
Date: | 2017-04-04 23:34:43 |
Message-ID: | 20170405.083443.185973376633708548.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres,
>> I think the code needs a few clarifying comments around this, but
>> otherwise seems good. Not restarting the timeout in those cases
>> obviously isn't entirely "perfect"/"correct", but a tradeoff - the
>> comments should note that.
>>
>> Tatsuo-san, do you want to change those, and push? I can otherwise.
>
> Andres,
>
> If you don't mind, could you please fix the comments and push it.
I have changed the comments as you suggested. If it's ok, I can push
the patch myself (today I have time to work on this).
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
statement-timeout-v3.patch | text/x-patch | 4.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-04 23:38:53 | Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2017-04-04 22:56:28 | Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql |