From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18 |
Date: | 2016-02-19 20:20:01 |
Message-ID: | 20160219202001.5knghmdwdsazurhj@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-02-04 16:54:58 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fabien asked me to post a new version of the checkpoint flushing patch
> series. While this isn't entirely ready for commit, I think we're
> getting closer.
>
> I don't want to post a full series right now, but my working state is
> available on
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/checkpoint-flush
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/andresfreund/postgres.git checkpoint-flush
I've updated the git tree.
Here's the next two (the most important) patches of the series:
0001: Allow to trigger kernel writeback after a configurable number of writes.
0002: Checkpoint sorting and balancing.
For 0001 I've recently changed:
* Don't schedule writeback after smgrextend() - that defeats linux
delayed allocation mechanism, increasing fragmentation noticeably.
* Add docs for the new GUC variables
* comment polishing
* BackendWritebackContext now isn't dynamically allocated anymore
I think this patch primarily needs:
* review of the docs, not sure if they're easy enough to
understand. Some language polishing might also be needed.
* review of the writeback API, combined with the smgr/md.c changes.
* Currently *_flush_after can be set to a nonzero value, even if there's
no support for flushing on that platform. Imo that's ok, but perhaps
other people's opinion differ.
For 0002 I've recently changed:
* Removed the sort timing information, we've proven sufficiently that
it doesn't take a lot of time.
* Minor comment polishing.
I think this patch primarily needs:
* Benchmarking on FreeBSD/OSX to see whether we should enable the
mmap()/msync(MS_ASYNC) method by default. Unless somebody does so, I'm
inclined to leave it off till then.
Regards,
Andres
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Allow-to-trigger-kernel-writeback-after-a-configurab.patch | text/x-patch | 37.3 KB |
0002-Checkpoint-sorting-and-balancing.patch | text/x-patch | 15.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-19 20:24:37 | Re: pg_ctl promote wait |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-19 20:13:14 | Re: FDW: should GetFdwRoutine be called when drop table? |