From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |
Date: | 2015-09-07 22:06:16 |
Message-ID: | 20150907220616.GW2912@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 18:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think the extra ugliness is warranted, since it's not THAT much
> > additional ugliness, and not doing it could be considered a regression;
> > apparently strftime can be slower even than snprintf, so doing it twice
> > per log message might be excessive overhead.
>
> Patch attached. Please take a quick look.
Looks good.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-07 22:31:48 | Re: New functions |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2015-09-07 22:02:54 | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |