Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?

Thank you for the correction.

At Wed, 4 Mar 2015 01:01:48 -0600, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> wrote in <54F6ADDC(dot)8030201(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
> On 3/3/15 8:04 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> >> >Note: The OID alias types don't sctrictly comply the transaction
> >> > isolation rules so do not use them where exact transaction
> >> > isolation on the values of these types has a
> >> > significance. Likewise, since they look as simple constants to
> >> > planner so you might get slower plans than the queries joining
> >> > the system tables correnspond to the OID types.
>
> Might I suggest:
>
> Note: The OID alias types do not completely follow transaction
> isolation rules. The planner also treats them as simple constants,
> which may result in sub-optimal planning.

Looks far simple and enough.
The note has been replaced with your sentence in the attached patch.

regards,

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center